【吳一包養心得國源】《周易》斷辭語義形態及意義問題初探

requestId:684aed7db60934.08238160.

A preliminary study on the situation and meaning of the “Book of Changes”

Author: Wu Guoyuan

Source: “Book of Changes” No. 2, 2017

Time: Confucius was in the 16th day of the lunar month of Dingyou

            Jesus February 1, 2018

Content summary:Although the confusion of literary language appears in the text of the Book of Changes, we can find that it has more mature and stable literary language characteristics through the study and analysis. Based on this, we deeply discuss the classifications of the system of the dying system, namely the three systems of Heng, Li and Ji’er. They each have the meaning of prediction, specification and direct judgment. In the overall language and ideological expression of this text, the situation of value judgment is based on the aggregation of value orientation and the determination of energy in an instant. A deep understanding of the linguistic characteristics and meaning problems of the dissolution can provide many new traces and paths for the research and development of the traditional Chinese thinking.

Keywords: The Book of Changes/Revolution/Text/Text/Trial/Value judgment

Title notes: National Social Sciences Fund Project: “Research on the Ideological Explanation Methods of the “Book of Changes”” (12XZX009).

Author introduction: Wu Guoyuan, Institute of Architecture History and Theory of Xi’an Architecture Institute, Xi’an Xi’an 710055 Wu Guoyuan (1973-), a native of Xi’an Town, Xi’an, Associate Professor of the Institute of Architecture History and Theory of Xi’an Architecture Science and Technology, the purpose of the important discussion is: Chinese philosophical history, architectural theory and history.

Regarding the problem of the conflict in the “Book of Changes”, the Yi-yi-edited “Secretary” has profoundly highlighted the meaning, classification, value and level correlation of the meaning, classification, and value of the conflict. ①The modern Yixue Research has learned about the problem of reconciliation, and there are twists and turns as the trend of academic thoughts changes. Overall, it is accompanied by the principle.The question of the nature of literature and its value of thinking has weakened the discussion on the connotation of the reconciliation itself and its verbal effectiveness. Although there are also many scholars who have disagreements on the connotation of the reconciliation and its value meaning (the one that is more prominent in this regard is the chief teacher of Chinese and English teachers)②, but it is far from the system of “System” and the explanation of the reconciliation; at the same time, students combine various unearthed data, and from the perspective of divination language, the characteristics of the reconciliation language and their characteristics are also given to Baozhuang gave some more profound cleaning and discussion. ③ From a general perspective, the research on Traditional Easy Science has a high emphasis on the problem of reconciliation and has systematic and profound descriptions, but limited to the attention to the text expression, it is difficult to form a concentrated problem consciousness and is limited by the authority of the language, which may cause attention to modern academics, and do not discuss creative transformation. Modern ease learning mostly lacks recognition and discussion of the overall nature of this text, so it is difficult to explore the system of exploring the problem from the perspective of text structure; at the same time, it is often used to interpret or use various modern academic vocabulary to give some specialized problems. The discussion on the issue of href=”https://twsugarlover.org/”>Inclusive Funding is also difficult to complete the systematic discussion on classical interpretation of the meaning. Our mission is to inherit the understanding of the relationship since “The Relationship”, but we emphasize the interpretation and separation based on the overall nature of this text, and try to explore the thinking and meaning of the relationship in modern academic language at the top of the system of this text itself. The problem of reconciliation is included in the study of the overall language of this text and obtained its corresponding support. Otherwise, the moral and linguistic meaning of reconciliation is only sourceless water—that is, the subject and context of the textual meaning is lacking. In this way, this article raises the question of exploring the verbal form and its ideological meaning in the text of the Book of Changes.

The verbal form presented in the text of the Book of Changes contains two problems: one is the verbal meaning of the verbal itself and its expression form, which is important to refer to the connotation, classification and the analysis method of the verbal analysis generated by the combination application of the verbal meaning; the other is its textual verbal structure characteristics, ④ that is, it compares with other verbal form elements in the hexagram and line sentences, and what kind of verbal effect it inherits and accomplishes the specific meaning expression.

To deeply explore the textual morphological problems in this article, you must first understand the textual morphological expression problems in this article. In the text of the Book of Changes, the relevant phenomena are incorrect and complicated, and the differences are difficult to distinguish.. The first is to break the complex textual phenomena in this text. The characters, lexicons and sentences have many differences in existing versions and document records. ⑤The second is the relationship between the reconciliation in the text of the Book of Changes and other types of divination and divination. It is difficult to distinguish, and the rationality is confusing and has no suitable value. The third is that the meaning of the closure in this text is difficult to trace the origin and flow, and the types of flexibly express. The combination of closures is unavailable, resulting in difficult linguistic relationships.

In this regard, starting from this article, we will first analyze the characteristics of the linguistic expression in the text in this text, and then classify and discuss the linguistic form problems of the system of the linguistic system. Finally, we will comprehensively analyze the linguistic structure characteristics and their meaning problems in the text in the hexagram and line recitation. Since these tasks are both verbal tests of a large number of documentary materials, and reflection problems in multiple theories and methods, it is difficult to fully understand and clarify the discussion tasks. The research and discussion tasks are only preliminary exploration, and are inappropriate or lacking. Comrades need to recommend and correct them.

1. The characteristics of the linguistic language of the “Book of Changes”

Due to the numerous different cultural phenomena in the form of literature, we cannot be too deeply concerned about the linguistic form of dialogue, but we can describe the relatively stable and mature linguistic usage of various relatively stable and mature linguistic languages, as well as the more clear linguistic expression relationships in the textual meanings of this text. In this regard, we will analyze it in advance from the following three aspects.

(I) Characteristics of independent usage of lyrics

The so-called independent usage of lyrics means that all kinds of lyrics have verbal independence and have their own independent grammatical efficacy. In exploring the verbal characteristics of the independent disjunction sentences of the hexagram and the line “small” meaning, we have comprehensively analyzed some independent disjunctions of the abundance of the abundance. In the Book of Changes, auspicious and singular use is important, and there is no dispute over their independent usage. The distortion of words such as “small” and “big” restrict their meanings, and cause assessment questions about whether they can have independent usage. By sorting out the relevant information, we clearly identified these intermittent independent usage problems. Due to the characteristics of this type of literary language of reign, this reign can be divided into three categories (the three categories of respective moral language judgments are described later): the word “heng” character “li” character “continuous”, and the system of “real” character “continuous”, and the system of reign of reign. Among them, there are divisions between the Gillian system and the Gillian system themselves, and thisIt is also a problem that has always been paid attention to in the history of Yi. For example, when talking about the rebellion system, Cheng of the Song Dynasty said: “Any rebellion that is difficult to deal with is different in detail. The smallest ones have words, and the most small ones are the rebellion system.”⑧ The “rebellion that is difficult to deal with is difficult” in the “Book of Changes” is the rebellion system, including silence, silence, silence, silence, silence, etc. The highest level is silence, silence, etc., and according to Cheng, “silence” is the smallest level among them. This is actually a “diffi